哪里能下到或者买到中英文对照的gre文章？

最新问答

• 非飞卖品

  我有，你把邮箱给我，我发给你
  
  这个带翻译：
  GRE阅读剖析及全真题解析(杨继著)s.taisha.org/viewthread.php?tid=548027&highlight=gre%2B%D4%%B6%C1
  
  另外这些都是不错的：
  GRE阅读39+3全攻略s.taisha.org/viewthread.php?tid=469460&highlight=gre%2B%D4%%B6%C1
  
  GRE阅读全攻略同步练习pdf版s.taisha.org/viewthread.php?tid=892441&highlight=gre%2B%D4%%B6%C1
  
  还有个“NO4~NO9钱坤强翻译”找不到链接可以发给你
  
  你可以买的书有：
  《杨继阅读》
  《GRE阅读理解全中文教程笔记》
  《GRE阅读全真题详解》
  
  你邮箱收不了大的附件，只发了NO4~NO9钱坤强翻译，你自己再把GRE阅读剖析及全真题解析下下来，就NO题和国内题的翻译都有了

  浏览 345赞 116时间 2023-12-24
• 热腾腾的鱼粥

  你错了，千万不能看带中文翻译的，你会觉得越学越差的，而且会产生强烈的依赖感，对于培养英语语感没有一点好处；强烈建议别这么练习英语~~~~

  浏览 391赞 147时间 2023-08-25
• 3未闻花名3

  一类特殊文章
  特征：后半部分有离题、转折内容，确认主题应该“从前不从后”，以前面结构为准。
  例文：
  1. Our visual perception depends on the reception of energy reflecting or radiating from that which we wish to perceive. If our eyes could receive and measure infinitely delicate sense-data, we could perceive the world with infinite precision. The natural limits of our eyes have, of course, been extended by mechanical instruments; telescopes and microscopes, for example, expand our capabilities greatly. There is, however, an ultimate limit beyond which no instrument can take us; this limit is imposed by our inability to receive sense-data smaller than those conveyed by an individual quantum of energy. Since these quanta are believed to be indivisible packages of energy and so cannot be further refined, we reach a point beyond which further resolution of the world is not possible. It is like a drawing a child might make by sticking indivisible discs of color onto a canvas.
  We might think that we could avoid this limitation by using quanta with extremely long wavelengths; such quanta would be sufficiently sensitive to convey extremely delicate sense-data. And these quanta would be useful, as long as we only wanted to measure energy, but a completely accurate perception of the world will depend also on the exact measurement of the lengths and positions of what we wish to perceive. For this, quanta of extremely long wavelengths are useless. To measure a length accurately to within a millionth of an inch, we must have a measure graduated in millionths of an inch; a yardstick graduated in inches is useless. Quanta with a wavelength of one inch would be, in a sense, measures that are graduated in inches. Quanta of extremely long wavelength are useless in measuring anything except extremely large dimensions.
  Despite these difficulties, quanta have important theoretical implications for physics. It used to be supposed that, in the observation of nature, the universe could be divided into two distinct parts, a perceiving subject and a perceived object. In physics, subject and object were supposed to be entirely distinct, so that a description of any part of the universe would be independent of the observer. The quantum theory, however, suggests otherwise, for every observation involves the passage of a complete quantum from the object to the subject, and it now appears that this passage constitutes an important coupling ween observer and observed. We can no longer make a sharp division ween the two in an effort to observe nature objectively. Such an attempt at objectivity would distort the crucial interrelationship of observer and observed as parts of a single whole. But, even for scientists, it is only in the world of atoms that this new development makes any appreciable difference in the explanation of observations
  2. Traditionally, the study of history has had fixed boundaries and focal points—periods, countries, dramatic events, and great leaders. It also has had clear and firm notions of scholarly procedure: how one inquires into a historical problem, how one presents and documents one's findings, what constitutes admissible and adequate proof.
  Anyone who has followed recent historical literature can testify to the revolution that is taking place in historical studies. The currently fashionable subjects come directly from the sociology catalog: childhood, work, leisure. The new subjects are accompanied by new methods. Where history once was primarily narrative, it is now entirely analytic. The old questions "What happened?" and "How did it happen?" have given way to the question "Why did it happen?" Prominent among the methods used to answer the question "Why" is psychoanalysis, and its use has given rise to psychohistory.
  Psychohistory does not merely use psychological explanations in historical contexts. Historians have always used such explanations when they were appropriate and when there was sufficient evidence for them. But this pragmatic use of psychology is not what psychohistorians intend. They are committed, not just to psychology in general, but to Freudian psychoanalysis. This commitment precludes a commitment to history as historians have always understood it. Psychohistory derives its "facts" not from history, the detailed records of events and their consequences, but from psychoanalysis of the individuals who made history, and deduces its theories not from this or that instance in their lives, but from a view of human nature that transcends history. It denies the basic criterion of historical evidence: that evidence be publicly accessible to, and therefore assessable by, all historians. And it violates the basic tenet of historical method: that historians be alert to the negative instances that would refute their theses. Psychohistorians, convinced of the absolute rightness of their own theories, are also convinced that theirs is the "deepest" explanation of any event, that other explanations fall short of the truth.
  Psychohistory is not content to violate the discipline of history (in the sense of the proper mode of studying and writing about the past); it also violates the past itself. It denies to the past an integrity and will of its own, in which people acted out of a variety of motives and in which events had a multiplicity of causes and effects. It imposes upon the past the same determinism that it imposes upon the present, thus robbing people and events of their individuality and of their complexity. Instead of respecting the particularity of the past, it assimilates all events, past and present, into a single deterministic schema that is presumed to be true at all times and in all circumstances.
  注意：这两篇文章已归属于前面的几大类，此处将它们再次提出，以引起大家的注意。

  浏览 267赞 88时间 2022-12-05
• 秋日偶语

  你是想要阅读还是写作的范文

  浏览 392赞 113时间 2022-04-13